Guidelines for reviewing research papers

Search Share A good peer review requires disciplinary expertise, a keen and critical eye, and a diplomatic and constructive approach. Writing a good review requires expertise in the field, an intimate knowledge of research methods, a critical mind, the ability to give fair and constructive feedback, and sensitivity to the feelings of authors on the receiving end.

Guidelines for reviewing research papers

The Paper Reviewing Process | How to Do Great Research

Peer Review Guidelines This guide is written to help you peer review manuscripts submitted to Dove Medical Press journals. Reading this should answer most of the queries you have and guide you in completing a peer review report in the most thorough and prompt way to ensure the paper is properly reviewed and published quickly.

If you have any further queries please submit them to our Editorial Offices. Our philosophy on peer review Authors have historically complained of the time it takes to get a paper published.

Dove Medical Press tries hard to process papers as thoroughly, fairly and rapidly as possible. As a result, peer reviewers are asked to submit their comments within 10 business days. All manuscripts submitted to Dove Medical Press journals are subject to single blind peer review.

Guidelines for writing a Review Article A) Good to know about review articles B) Elements of a review article the review, defines the focus, the research question and explains the text structure. Elements Elements of a three paragraph introduction (after Anonymous ). Help authors improve their papers by providing your professional expertise. Gain a sense of prestige in being consulted as an expert! Play an important role in maintaining a good, rigorous peer-review process. Expand your awareness of the current research emerging within your field. Help authors improve their papers by providing your professional expertise. Gain a sense of prestige in being consulted as an expert! Play an important role in maintaining a good, rigorous peer-review process. Expand your awareness .

We believe that using anonymous peer reviewers is the best way to get honest opinions on papers. Dove Medical Press requires that peer reviewers not contact authors directly. An outline of the manuscript lifecycle, from submission to publication, can be viewed here.

What is peer review?

Guidelines for reviewing research papers

Peer review is the process in which manuscripts are sent to impartial experts in the field who evaluate their quality and scientific soundness before publication. The exact process used for peer review varies between publishers and from journal to journal, but generally the method will fall into one of three categories: This is often performed in addition to traditional pre-publication peer review, and attempts to provide a platform for the wider research community to discuss published papers and authors to respond to comments on their work.

Why is peer review important? Peer review ensures that manuscripts receive unbiased critique and expert feedback, allowing authors to improve their manuscript and therefore high quality scientific research and reviews to be published.

It also helps the readers to trust the scientific integrity of the article and to make informed decisions where peer reviewer comments are available.

The Peer Reviewer After receiving a request to peer review it is essential that peer reviewers respond in a timely fashion, particularly if they cannot do the review, to avoid unnecessarily delaying the process.

Peer reviewers should declare any conflicts of interest seeking advice from the publisher if they are unsureand possess sufficient knowledge in the field to perform a thorough assessment of the manuscript. You can find further information on competing interests here. Peer reviewers must keep any information regarding the identity of the authors and the content of the manuscript confidential.

Peer review comments should be objective and constructive without being of a hostile or derogatory nature. Further information on ethical peer review issues and conflicts of interest can be found in the COPE guidelines. Writing the Report Peer reviewers should assess the major strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript as well as look at the statistical power of the study if relevant.

In the first part of their report, peer reviewers should write a short summary describing their assessment of the manuscript. They should then provide general comments to be addressed, followed by any specific comments they may have.

Comments should be numbered so that authors can easily refer to them in their point-by-point response to referee comments. All requested major revisions should be clearly outlined. If any form of misconduct is suspected such as plagiarism, undeclared conflicts of interest, falsification of results etc.

Peer reviewers must ensure that they answer the following questions in their report: In general, is the paper easy to follow and does it have a logical flow? Does the English grammar, punctuation or spelling need to be corrected?And I'm not going to take on a paper to review unless I have the time.

For every manuscript of my own that I submit to a journal, I review at least a few papers, so I give back to the system plenty. The Paper Reviewing Process Posted: October 18, Program committee chairs sometimes provide guidelines for writing reviews, Whether you end up reviewing a lot of papers as a Ph.D.

student, your research will definitely be subject to the paper review process. It is imperative as a researcher to understand this process. Format for a review paper Title page: Title-- reflecting topic of review Your Name Date Abstract: An abstract should be of approximately words.

Provide a brief summary of the review question being addressed or rationale for the review, the major studies reviewed, and conclusions drawn. Please do not cite references in the Abstract.

Guidelines for peer reviewing of research papers and manuscripts for submission. Dove Press specializes in publishing medical journals. Peer Review Guidelines.

Guidelines for reviewing research papers

Does the paper fit the aims and scope of the journal? (Each journal has an "Aims and Scope" link on the upper right of its home page). A review article or review paper is based on other published articles. It does not report original research.

How to review a paper | Science | AAAS

Review articles generally summarize the existing literature on a topic in an attempt to explain the current state of understanding on the topic.

Guidelines for writing a Review Article A) Good to know about review articles B) Elements of a review article the review, defines the focus, the research question and explains the text structure. Elements Elements of a three paragraph introduction (after Anonymous ).

The Paper Reviewing Process | How to Do Great Research